Hydrargyrum. . . Mercury. It has been described in many ways throughout history, but these days almost everyone CDC for the World Health Organization seems to be on the same page on one thing -. Which is highly toxic
Although it is a natural element (curiously, the only metal that is liquid at room temperature), which was only present in very small amounts in the atmosphere from the surface to the last century when the industrial activities began releasing on a massive scale. Once released, it can circulate in the environment indefinitely. – A fact that has caused international effort to reduce mercury emissions
Mercury is highly toxic – can cause organ damage, damage to the immune system, and cognitive problems. ( source ) is considered a risk factor for autoimmune disorders in women of childbearing potential and has been implicated in a variety of other disorders. I wrote more about what the experts have to say about the risks of mercury exposure here.
What are the most common sources of mercury?
According to the World Health Organization, dental amalgams are the main source of mercury exposure for people who have fillings “silver”. ( source ) Although they were once thought to be inert, current research shows chewing, drinking hot liquids, brushing and other activities releases mercury vapor from amalgams. ( Font 1 Source 2 ) It is estimated that about 80% of inhaled mercury vapor is absorbed by the lungs and spreads throughout the body. ( source )
There are other routes of exposure to mercury, as well :. Seafood, creams for skin lightening, and pharmaceutical preservatives, for example
The dilemma detoxification
Daddypotamus and I have tried to limit the exposure of our family by eating fish and seafood low in mercury (you can find a list here ), but until last year he had fillings “silver”. I have already shared with you why they chose to have their dental amalgams removed last year, along with information on the removal of fillings safely and how to find a provider.
who had planned to help detoxification after removal (because, as already stated, the exposure is happening without doubt), but after reading several books on the subject and talk to our local holistic practitioner, I did it. . . nothing.
The problem? Once he arrived at his appointment to the dentist expressed concern about the approach we decided with our Doctor of holistic, and after considering entering I was not able to find an approach I felt comfortable.
I continued reading and researching, but I’d pretty much hit a wall until I heard Chris Kresser and Dr. Chris Shade, who founded Quicksilver Scientific , discuss a new approach this podcast , it took me several hours of interviews and scientific papers.
If you are not familiar with it, Dr. Shade is a specialist in environmental chemistry and analysis of mercury developed a proprietary analysis technology for analysis of mercury speciation. (In plain English, this means that he has discovered a way to detect different types of mercury in the body and determine how well the body’s being removed.)
What I learned helped gather all I’ve been collecting research. I recommend you listen podcast , but if you’re like me, you may need to hear it 2-3 times before it all sinks. Before the pop more, here are some key points that help bind.
Please note that “Best Kisser gaffe South Puckett gas station” is almost as official as it gets for me professionally. I’m not a doctor and this is not medical advice. If you need some convincing about this, read my full disclaimer where I say again and again. Okay, let’s jump in!
Myth # 1: A single diagnostic test can detect all forms of mercury
When it comes to study individuals for mercury, to it is often assumed that all forms of mercury are equally represented in the results. However, according to Dr. Shade, the form of mercury is in amalgams (inorganic mercury) does not appear in hair analysis, and is poorly represented in the blood. It could appear in the urine, but only if detoxification pathways of the body are functioning optimally.
On the other hand, organic mercury (as methyl mercury in fish) shown in the hair and is best detected in the blood. While that is good information to have, it is too easy to overlook the presence of inorganic mercury, which is highly toxic to the body.
Dr. Shade also leads to another problem with the evidence – evidence of provocation. Basically, the idea here is that some individuals have difficulty mercury exposure for disposal. So you can be there, but looking for it in blood / urine / hair is not as useful if you are trapped in the tissues. When practitioners suspect that this might be happening, sometimes a “challenge test” using a chelating agent such as DMSA (meso-2-, 3-dimercaptosucccinic) to mobilize the mercury in the body, then recommended measures which mobilizes.
Think of it like this: You have a glass of water with sediment in it. If you draw water from the top and the test for sediment, it becomes relatively “clean” because the sediment is in the background. However, if the glass is removed first, much sediment will be present in the sample. challenge testing is a bit like that.
The potential problem with this approach is that settled the midrange, and low high levels of mercury in people who did not receive a chelator. In other words, their “glasses” not agitated before samples are taken. Those with a lot of sediment samples probably had much more sediment at the bottom. In samples of stirring, the total amount of sediment could be much smaller, but lab tests show that are approximately equal. This may cause some people believe they have “high” levels of mercury when actually might have low / medium levels compared to the rest of the population. To make the situation even more difficult, some people with severely compromised detoxification pathways can not excrete the amount of mercury, even with the challenge test. This could lead to a practitioner to the conclusion that it is not much mercury is present when in fact it is.
To solve these problems, Dr. Shade adapted a technique developed for the detection of different forms of mercury in the environment – either due to chronic or acute exposure – in a laboratory test for diagnosis not using the challenge test. It is called the Tri-proof, and is determined not only the type of mercury present but also how well the body is removing it. You can find the laboratory test here . (This is not an affiliate link I have no financial relationship with the laboratory, except as a client..)
Myth # 2: Chelation is the best starting point for everyone
most mercury detoxification protocols involve the use of chelating agents – either natural as Chlorella or prescription as DMSA (meso-2-, 3-dimercaptosucccinic) or DPMS (2,3-dimercaptopropan-1-sulfonic acid ) sometimes used provocative tests. While they can be useful in mobilizing mercury in the body, according to Dr. Shade is only useful if detoxification pathways of the body are functioning properly and that can make it go.
For certain people who have compromised detoxification pathways (whether due to the effects of mercury accumulation or genetic mutations as the MTHFR ), mercury may fail to leave the body and move to another part of the body instead. The big concern is that could happen to the brain or other vital organs, which can cause more harm than wherever it was before. (This is also considered by some as a concern regarding the challenge test.)
This is how Dr. Shade explains in the interview.
There are plenty of capable professionals who have made great strides with people with DMPS and DMSA, but these were the chelators were designed for industrial environments. DMPS was made for factory workers in the battery industry in Russia and East Germany who were exposed to very high levels of lead and cadmium, and were able to take these people for otherwise healthy people who were clearly only toxic metal and shoot down those burdens and get back to work.
But the problem is a lot of people we deal with have multifactorial problems. There are some infectious problems, there are leaky bowel problems, there are some problems in the kidneys, and is bringing with them the accumulation of toxins such as metals, and they will be hyper-toxic or hypersensitive to these metals. So trying to grab those metals and say, ‘Well, that’s the only problem; we will force them out through the kidneys, ‘often leads to more harm than good. “
Instead of taking this approach, Dr. Shade starts by supporting routes detoxification of the body – making sure the drains are open, if you want in the scientific jargon that sounds like this:
in a microcosm, which is the cell and that is the chemical in the cell. and so it will go up resistance cell metal as it pushes things out of the cell in the fluids circulating, but that is also responsible for the effect macrocosmic to move those conjugates of metal-glutathione out in urine flow, out in the Bioflow. so on one level, we headed to the cell resistance. on a broader level, we turn to what is called the drain or the movement of people out of circulation and fecal excretion and urinary excretion. So upregulation of glutathione system is the detoxification approach we use. ”
In practical terms, you need to know is that he has developed a supplement protocol that supports detoxification. Although some products are available directly to the public, most have to be obtained through a practitioner. If you do not have one near you, they have a doctor working with long distance customers. You can find a list of professionals using the protocol here . (Again, this is not an affiliate link.)
Myth # 3: Mercury affects everyone in the same way
This myth is not directly related to the podcast, but I think it is worth including. As mentioned in this article dental amalgams , some researchers believe that certain individuals are genetically more vulnerable to the adverse effects of mercury than others.
This analysis of a study on children found “evidence of harm,” including neurobehavioral deficits and kidney damage in children who were exposed to mercury through dental amalgams . The group appeared to be more susceptible were men with the genetic mutation CPOX4, but the analysis says that at least five mutations “seem to convey more susceptible to mercury toxicity.”
Historically, some doctors used to believe there was a specific cutoff point between “concern” and “does not affect” numbers. However, as we learn more about epigenetics (the interaction between our genes and environmental factors), the cutoff point seems to be more nuanced.
Myth # 4: You can detox until all amalgams are removed
So here’s a question that many patients often have to do with, what is that do the test, they learn they have high levels of mercury, and still have dental amalgams, but perhaps for economic reasons or where they live, they can not get at least all taken away, and want to know if they can start treatment when they are still present. And in the past, of course, the idea of starting chelation when you still had amalgams, was not very big. “- Chris Kresser
As someone who has been through this with my husband (who has to wait until the budget and the availability supplier were both in place), I was so happy to hear the Dr. Shade response. Basically, reiterated that chelation is not a good idea for the reasons discussed above, but optimizing detoxification pathways with the first phase of the protocol, it is considered appropriate.
with this system, you can. As I said, it starts low and work on high. you will not go to the highest levels of this while still having amalgams, but you can make the older levels and do not have a problem at all. “
Myth # 4 is absolutely necessary to have a lab test before starting
One of the things Chris Kresser raised in the interview is that many laboratory tests are not covered and some individuals need to save their money for treatment. While both agreed that the laboratory results are useful, I love that Kresser asked this question:
So is there any risk that someone, a doctor or a patient, making a therapeutic trial of, like, the Qube detoxification protocol without testing?
Dr. The response of the screen:
No. The difference is that you have to listen more. You have to listen to your body and your symptoms simply be more and more aware of what’s going on. The only thing that is difficult to treat is when the proportions of bloody urine are bad, which would preventively kidney support him. If you do the test, you decide to add or not add. If you will not do the test, absolutely add support kidney alone as a prophylactic measure. And then just be aware of how the treatment goes, and not push yourself too hard. If you feel very symptomatic, a backup. But no problem, as long as you do that. “
Questions about mercury detoxification?
I am not an expert, but I’m working with a practitioner who is very knowledgeable about the protocol of Dr. Shade. If you have a question let down and see what I can find out for you!
The post 5 Myths About Mercury Detox You Need to Know , source: http://www.mommypotamus.com/mercury-detox/